Thursday, 29 March 2012

A CONSCIOUS AFRICA PEOPLE OF CHANGE LONG DESIRED: CRITICAL LOOK AT AFRICAN TODAY’S POLITICS IN THE YEAR 2011


A CONSCIOUS AFRICA PEOPLE OF CHANGE LONG DESIRED: CRITICAL LOOK AT AFRICAN TODAY’S POLITICS IN THE YEAR 2011

Chijioke Akusoronwa

Africa, the ‘‘Land of Origins’’ is no doubt a great continent. Africa’s history, geography, languages, endowments and people are indeed a blessing. Africa, as the second largest of Earth’s seven continents, covering 23 percent of the world’s total land area and containing 13 percent of the world’s population makes her according to my research a ‘‘Home of Unity and Harmony’’. But, Africa antecedents especially in some countries like Nigeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Cote d’Ivoire, Sudan, Kenya, Zimbabwe, Libya etcetera over the past few years is really begging some questions to be answered, which I will try to attempt in this short piece of work.

I would like to make succinctly clear the understanding of class consciousness as an important discuss from this work given the nature of our African leaders’ classism. Classism explains the discrimination or prejudice based on social or economic class, which had made our democracy a mirage in the presence of the yearning, resolution and submissiveness of the people of Nigeria and Africa at large to their governments. Class consciousness is rising in Africa as a result of the wide spread literacy level of African people; especially the youths whom I think must have read the works of many scholars like, Aristotle, St Thomas Aquinas, Jean Calvin, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Adam Smith, Jeremy Bentham and especially the works of Karl Marx (Communist Manifesto). Marx works becomes resoundingly inevitable especially the part where Marx works was trying to build class consciousness through class struggle thus uniting these people (the deprived in today’s world) in the pursuance of one united goal.

Marx outlines his theory of history and prophesies ‘‘an end to exploitation’’ now bad leadership. Identifying class struggle as the primary dynamic in history, he characterizes the modern world as the stage for a dramatic confrontation between the ruling bourgeoisie (the capitalists’ now the African leaders) and the downtrodden proletariat (the working class now the African Citizens). Driven by the logic of capitalism (now power) to seek ever greater profit, the bourgeoisie constantly revolutionizes the means of economic production (now political might), the fulcrum of history.

In so doing, it unwittingly sets in motion socio-historical forces that it can no longer control, thus ironically calling into existence the class destined to end its rule—the proletariat (now African People). As the proletariat (now the African Citizens) increases in number and political awareness, heightened class antagonism will, according to the Manifesto, generate a revolution and the inevitable defeat of the bourgeoisie (now African leaders).
 
Arising from the above view, you will see for yourself why there is a need for a clarion call in which Karl Marx wanted it to be for unity: “Workers of All Countries, Unite!” now  I think it should be for progress: ‘‘Africans Citizens of All Countries, Move Forward!’’


Abraham Lincoln once said, “As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master. This expresses my idea of democracy. Whatever differs from this, to the extent of the difference, is no democracy.”

This above statement is important to African leaders as consciousness begin to rise in the faces of oppression, mal-administration, monopoly of power, dictatorship, tyranny and abuse of public trust, that the people whom power of a state resides in their hands can no longer be taken for a foul.

The New Year 2011 is important for the trends of changes it has witnessed since its start. The year opened up in Nigeria with so many political issues that were done on Nigerians that change was indeed inevitable. Amid, the causes of these conscious changes arises from failed dividend of democracy, lack of leadership for over five months, failed Nigerian constitution to address salient political and economic issues, zoning system of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), failed early arrival of voters registration machines known as INEC Data Capture Machines, shift in voters registration exercise, alarming insecurity in some parts of Nigeria such as: Jos, Abia, Abuja, Ogun, Oyo, Bauchi, Akwa Ibom, Kaduna etc, 25% of National Assembly spending, removal of PDP National Chairman, and the emergence of the Presidential candidate in the Presidential primaries of the PDP in the person of Dr. Ebele Jonathan Azikiwe Goodluck; who also was the incumbent President of Nigeria. Again, agitation for extension of voters’ registration period; in order to allow more Nigerian to register, political killings, incessant doctors strikes, kerosene palava, 200 percent hike in the prices of commodities; even though they claimed inflation was between 7 to 10 percent, massive youth unemployment, corrupt government practises, brain drain etcetera were also pointers to Nigerians consciousness.


‘‘If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.’’ – John F. Kennedy

Many of our African leaders and politicians are of the view that they can always have their ways provided they have the money to manoeuvre the people. They forget the popular African saying, ‘‘A child who does not allow the mother to sleep will not have his/her own sleep as well.’’ It goes to say that our African leader must bear in mind that, in as much as the poor are made to suffer while they themselves enjoy what belongs to the people they would also have no rest. This is because, crime will continue to increase, robbery, killings and all manner of vices until the people are engaged in enjoying what is meant for them.


‘‘Everything flows and nothing stays.’’ – Heraclitus

For Tunisians, a country with a population of 10,378,140 (2008 estimate) with Gross domestic product (GDP) of over $30 billion (2006) and GDP per capital income of $2,991.50 (2006) is still faced with unemployment, economic problems and slow pace of democratic reforms.

As if that is not enough, a country where its president, Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali took power as a prime minister in 1987 from its president, Bourguiba, still want to remain in power after 24years of his leadership. Isn’t that surprising in this 21st Century? That, our leaders in African countries to begin to realise that one person can’t continually rule a country all the time especially, when the people think they have had enough of his leadership in order to take in another leader with new ideas of doing things

In Egypt, after Sadat was assassinated by a group of Islamist officers on October 6, 1981, while reviewing a military parade in Cairo commemorating Egypt’s victory in the 1973 war, lead to the handover of power to Mubarak.

But, it is still surprising that Mubarak would still wait until chased out of office after a long appeal and death of his own people until the international community’s involves themselves before he could vacate the seat which he sat for over 29years.

In Cote d’Ivoire, the story is unchanged with a population of 18,373,060 (2008 estimate), 15 percent Life expectancy of 49.2 years (2008 estimate), Infant Mortality rate of 86 deaths per 1,000 live births (2008 estimate) all shows the level of poor health policies, infrastructures, social amenities, economic decadence coupled with pockets of tribal and political crisis.

Again, the bane of underdevelopment and conflict is also centred on the problem of leadership in Cote d’Ivoire. Let take for example, Félix Houphouët-Boigny who became the first President of Côte D’ivoire in 1960. He was subsequently re-elected every five years until he died in office in 1993. Then Laurent Gbagbo, who became President since 1993 to 2011 and still desire to continue in office even after losing in a general election won by Alassane Ouattara. The question that comes to mind is: When would such seat tight on power in Africa be over?

For Sudan, oil; which would had been a blessing have far more become not just a burden of curses but also an engine room for incessant killings, wars and enmity among a country of two divided ideology, region, religion and leadership. A country with a population of 40,218,455 people (2008 estimate), 12 percent Life expectancy of 50.3 years (2008 estimate), Infant Mortality rate of 87 deaths per 1,000 live births (2008 estimate). The statistics tells me that Sudan would have been a great, rich and blessed country had it been that they were able to see beyond the oil, by looking at other potential natural endowments and resource, putting in mind unity in diversity and forming a kind of leadership that would use some attributes of Federal and Parliamentary structure of government.

For Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who became president of Sudan, during a military coup in 1989, has not shown much success for 22year of leadership. Even his new referendum idea and result has not been marched with the desired process of making the country better.

However, Sudan seems to be led by a leader who’s managerial, personality trait and leadership vision is narrowed to belated aspiration without taken a leadership paradigm shift in the unification, development and re-orientation of his people (North and South Sudan).

Mwai Kibaki, the President of Kenya is also among the African leaders that have not lived up to their constitutional vows. He was elected president of Kenya in 2002, having previously served as a political minister under Kenya’s first two presidents, Jomo Kenyatta and Daniel Arap Moi.


But with all his vast experiences, the zeal of building a one united stronger East African hegemon, Kenya, is still far from him. His winner-takes-all politics, electoral frauds, underdevelopment of many sectors in Kenya, and loss of lives of many Kenyans show how sensitive his commitment sends to his people and the outside world.

Zimbabwe, is not left out in the discussion of South African politics. For those who understood her political history in attaining independence in 1980 and her help in modifying the regions politics does not also mean that changes after a long concluded understanding cannot be achieved if truly our leaders are really patriotic.   

For Robert Gabriel Mugabe, who has also been among the longest holders of political power for thirty-two years and is not allowing any other person is not a true character of leadership, patriotism and service to his dear country. He became Zimbabwe’s first prime minister in 1980 after independence and later president of the country in 1987 after constitutional reform abolished the office of prime minister. Although, Mugabe had helped lead the Black Nationalist Movement in the 1970s that ended white minority rule and secured the country’s formal independence from the United Kingdom in 1980. But, how does that translate him to a sit tight in power for over 30yrs without learning for his counterparts Nelson Mandela.

Libya was colonized by Italy in the early 20th century. The country became an independent monarchy in 1951, and in 1969 young army officer Muammar al-Qaddafi seized power. Qaddafi proceeded to create a new Libya based on his theories of socialism and Arab nationalism. Though, Libya was a poor country until the discovery of oil in the 1950s. Since then its large reserves of petroleum have made Libya one of the wealthiest countries in Africa.

But, under Qaddafi’s leadership Libya took a much more active role not only in Arab affairs but also in international politics. Though, Libya was governed by the principle of Jamahiriya “state of the masses” under a constitution adopted in 1977 by the General People’s Congress (GPC), which was established by the National Legislature in 1976. The tenet behind this political arrangement is the Third Universal Theory, expounded by Muammar al-Qaddafi in his three-volume tract, The Green Book. But the question still remains: When will Qaddafi leave the seat of government for other Libyans to rule in his over 42years of tyrannical rule of the Libyan people?

I would like to end this short work by saying that all these consciousness are made possible with Nigerian literacy rate of 70.7 percent (2005 estimate), Tunisian literacy rate of 76.2 percent (2005 estimate), Egypt literacy rate of 59.3 percent (2005 estimate), Cote d’Ivoire literacy rate of 53.6 percent (2005 estimate), Sudan literacy rate of 63.2 percent (2005 estimate), Kenya literacy rate of 86.9 percent (2005 estimate), Zimbabwe literacy rate of 91.9 percent (2005 estimate), Libya literacy rate of 84.2 percent (2005 estimate), thus putting to question why one person (leader) cannot think of turning himself into a tyrannical government in the presence of a people’s sovereign state even with their slow pace of democratic reforms which most African leaders tends to pursue.

CHIJIOKE, holds a professional certification in Management and a first degree in Political Science and one of the best graduating student in the said discipline from Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria. He is passionate about providing the leading platform for bearing the burden for his clients’ zenith successes which is hinged at providing exceptional Consulting Services in the areas of paper writing, biographies, training, political advisory, public speaking, business development, product marketing and advert production all in a practical solution driven and goal oriented perspectives. As the Principal/Head Consultant, HeroesPlus Consultant based in Lagos, his interest in research and development made him a social blogger and a prolific biographer. Among his works includes: Celebrating Our Country In Doubt: A Question Begging Patriotic Answer; Challenging Your Dreams; Nigeria Sixth Republic: 50 Years Of Unfinished Leadership; 2011, April Ballot: Winners, Losers And The Nigerians Lesson, among others. He is a member of Civil Liberty Organization, Rotaract Club to mention a few.

Send your questions and comments to heroesplusconsultant@gmail.com
To read more...Click on my Facebook page then ‘‘My Notes’’ to see some of my articles.
Thank you for reading.

Monday, 28 November 2011

NIGERIA SIXTH REPUBLIC: 50 YEARS OF UNFINISHED LEADERSHIP


NIGERIA SIXTH REPUBLIC: 50 YEARS OF UNFINISHED LEADERSHIP
Chijioke Akusoronwa


            
                              
Nigeria became an independent country in 1960, but under a parliamentary system of government which was practiced in 1960 - 1963. But the system did not make our country, Nigeria a truly sovereign and independent state in managing the affairs of its country especially the nature of her constitution; the President a ceremonial figure, representing the Queen of England and not elected by the people, and the final court was also foreign in nature. All these parliamentary system fallouts were corrected in the 1963 Constitution which brought about a Republican constitution and with the peoples’ believe that the best government is one in which supreme power is vested in an electorate.

In 1963, Nigerians went to the poll and it brought about Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe as first elected President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. This marked the beginning of the first republic and the Republican Presidential system of government in Nigeria. But, sooner than expected, this system was faced out with the genesis of military intervention in Nigerian politic like its counterparts in other African countries.

The military involvement in politics in Nigeria that halted the first republic started on 15th January, 1966 from Johnson Aguiyi-Ironsi to Colonel Yakubu Gowon (29th July, 1966 - 29th July, 1975) and continued to Murtala Mohammed (29th July, 1975 – 13th Feb, 1976), who was succeeded by his Deputy, General Olusegun Obasanjo after his assassination, until on 1 October, 1979 when General Olusegun Obasanjo handed power over  to a democratic elected civilian president of Nigeria, Alhaji Shehu Shagari which also marked the second republic.

But, soon after the civilian president took power, the government was faced with large corruption and money bag politics. Even with Shagari bid to protecting his political party, National party of Nigeria (NPN) motto of "One Nation, One Destiny" and objectives of providing Housing, Industries, Transportation and Agriculture as the major goals of his administration, particularly in his early stages of governance during the oil boom were all met with incongruous outcomes. It is important to note, that the prominence of money bags politics which financed the elections of 1979 and lapse ethical judgement by ministers under Shagari, especially the man whose name rings a bell; Umaru Dikko - Shagari campaign manager and later Minister of Transportation, heightened allegations of corruption. This included the Nigeria election of 1983 marked by accusations of electoral fraud, coupled with a decline in world oil prices, led to a marked deterioration in the national finances under Shagari's watch, while religious and political violence became so endemic that his overthrow by Major General Muhammadu Buhari on New Year's Eve in 1983 was actually looked upon with relief by most of the Nigerian public at the time. Again, this marked the end of the second republic due to another military intervention and a failed transition into another democratic elected president.

After the Shagari’s leadership, the military government of Major General Muhammadu Buhari took power in 1983 which continued with successive military coups from Major General Ibrahim Babangida (27th August, 1985 – 26th August, 1993), who after annulling  the June 12 election handed over to Ernest Shonekan on 26th August, 1993. The handover of power to Ernest Shonekan was short lived before power was taken over from him by General Sani Abacha on 17th November, 1993 until his death on 8 June, 1998 when the Supreme Military Council decided to hand power to General Abdulsalam Abubakar who was to hand power to a civilian democratically elected president of Nigeria. This task of bringing back the civilian to power was not just announced but also meticulously implemented and finally brought about the emergence of May 29, 1999, now known as a public holiday in Nigeria and celebrated as a new Democracy Day which brought the leadership of Olusegun Obasanjo under the platform of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP).

The Olusegun Obasanjo first tenure of 1999 – 2003 was the third republic. The 1999 elections, was the first in sixteen years after a military long intervention in Nigeria politics. In the election, Obasanjo won with 62.6% of the vote, sweeping the strongly Christian Southeast and the predominantly Muslim north, but decisively lost his home region, the Southwest, to his fellow-Yoruba and Christian, Olu Falae, the only other candidate.

Again, Obasanjo was re-elected in 2003 – 2007 which also marked the fourth republic, in a tumultuous election that had violent ethnic and religious overtones, his main opponent (fellow former military ruler General Muhammadu Buhari) being a Muslim who drew his support mainly from the north. Capturing 61.8% of the vote, Obasanjo defeated Buhari by more than 11 million votes. Buhari and other defeated candidates (including Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, the former Biafran leader of the 1960s who was the presidential candidate for APGA), claimed that the election was fraudulent.

Umaru Musa Yar'Adua was the fifth republican President of Nigeria and the 13th Head of State. He was declared the winner of the controversial Nigerian presidential election under the ruling party, People's Democratic Party (PDP), held on 21 April 2007, and was sworn in on 29 May 2007. In the presidential election, Yar'Adua won with 70% of the vote (24.6 million votes) according to official results released on 23 April. The election was strongly criticized by observers, as well as the two primary opposition candidates, Muhammadu Buhari of the All Nigeria People's Party (ANPP) and Atiku Abubakar of the Action Congress (AC), its results were largely rejected as having been rigged in Yar'Adua's favour
.
But, as bad as it may seem that the election was rigged, most Nigerian began to even legitimate the leadership of Yar’Adua, due to his leadership ability in putting to an end some pressing problem soon as sworn in as president of Nigeria. Again, some also saw that he was able to provide practical solutions having been the first Nigerian president to have been educated in a Nigerian university. Be that as it may, his administration was short lived due to his illness and died on 5th May, 2010.

On 6th May 2010, Jonathan was sworn in as Yar'Adua's replacement on 6 May 2010, becoming Nigeria's 14th Head of State. He served as President until the next election in April 2011, which he also contested and won as President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Upon taking office on 6th May, Jonathan cited anti-corruption, power and electoral reform as likely focuses of his administration. He stated that he came to office under "very sad and unusual circumstances."

Dr. Goodluck Ebele Azikiwe Jonathan after contesting and winning the 16th April, 2011 general election marked the beginning of the sixth republic, when he was also sworn in on 29th May, 2011. The April general election was seen as an improvement in the history of elections in Nigeria as promised in his speech on 6th May, 2010 even although the incumbent Presidential took part and won in the general election. The changes saw a more efficient INEC with the correction of mistakes from its first election on 9th April, 2011. And, when the result was released, it was constitutional won by Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, the incumbent President of Nigeria, under the Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP) flag, in what most Nigerian describe as a victory of the people’s choice with a total of 22,495,187 votes representing 58.89% and winning in 24 states of the federation and meeting the requirement of having 25% of total vote cast in at least 24 states (two-third majority) while the other parties have the following results: CPC, 12,214,853 – 31.98%; ACN, 2,067,301 – 5.41%; ANPP, 917,012 – 2.40%; and all others remaining parties clenched a total of 504,866 votes – 1.32%.

Finally, the sixth republic is greeted with high expectations from the president to all elected representatives and to other appointed Nigerians that would be called to serve with the need to putting back the country to her footpath of greatness. The greatness is expected to be pursued not just on paper works but in a realistic and attainable people oriented needs: power, security, employment opportunities, programme, projects, infrastructures, policies and social amenities that will improve the standard of living of the largest Nigerian masses.

CHIJIOKE, holds a professional certification in Management and a first degree in Political Science and one of the best graduating student in the said discipline from Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria. He is passionate about providing the leading platform for bearing the burden for his clients’ zenith successes which is hinged at providing exceptional Consulting Services in the areas of paper writing, biographies, training, political advisory, public speaking, business development, product marketing and advert production all in a practical solution driven and goal oriented perspectives. As the Principal/Head Consultant, HeroesPlus Consultant based in Lagos, his interest in research and development made him a social blogger and a prolific biographer. Among his works includes: Celebrating Our Country In Doubt: A Question Begging Patriotic Answer; Challenging Your Dreams; A Conscious Africa People Of Change Long Desired: Critical Look At African Today’s Politics In The Year 2011; A Charade Celebration Of Childrens’ Day, among others. He is a member of Civil Liberty Organization, Rotaract Club to mention a few.

Send your questions and comments to heroesplusconsultant@gmail.com
To read more...Click on my Facebook page then ‘‘My Notes’’ to see some of my articles.
Thank you for reading.

Thursday, 24 November 2011

GEJ: NIGERIANS AWAITS YOUR PROMISES


GEJ: NIGERIANS AWAITS YOUR PROMISES
Chijioke Akusoronwa

Goodluck Ebele Jonathan (GEJ) after the April 16, 2011 election emerged as the presidential elect from the just concluded presidential battle and history in Nigerian politics. The election was overwhelming won by GEJ not because of his party but in what most Nigerians ascribe to his personality, leadership traits, vision, humility (especially his patience during the drama that transpired after the death of his boss Yar A’dua), and the trend of change most Nigerians are awaiting to see in a new breed of leaders especially in GEJ.


Although, after the election there were some pockets of conflicts in some northern parts of the country Nigeria, in an election believed to be the most peaceful and well-organized since the inception of democracy in Nigerian or since 1999. This then, puts the question on our politicians to understand that the politics of today Nigerian, has gone beyond what the individual politicians contesting election thinks: his/her party or his/her supporters but what the people believe in who they what to see control the affairs that directly or indirectly affects their future.

I do not know if I speak the mind of every Nigerian, but, I am of that belief that I say what every single concerned Nigerian speaks of her dear country, Nigeria. Now that GEJ has emerged as our President elect, Nigerians are concerned with the president that can solve our problems of 50 years of independent leadership. Among these problems to be solved are:

LEADERSHIP caused by lack of accountability and loss of patriotism. First, it is very important for GEJ to look at leadership which is the bane of our problem after our independence. Most of us have forgotten that we all must be good leaders in our respective offices. This is most exemplified in the Nigerian leaders with poor leadership traits since independence which has cost us these poor levels of development and unity, thus, forgetting that they are examples to followers and represents the body of government. Abraham Lincoln once said ‘‘the legitimate object of government is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves – in their separate, and individual capacities.’’

HEALTH issues in our today Nigeria is ‘‘a no go area’’. This is because there are three achetype situations in Nigeria: one - (Rural) here, there are neither health facilities, workers nor English medicine in so many rural areas in Nigeria since independence; two - (Sub-urban) there are some few medical facilities, few medical personnels and few medicine at throat cutting cost while the other things not sufficient leaves one to travel several kilometres to get them even medical operation; three, (urban) here, there are let say, sufficient hospital, medical personnels and medicine but funny enough, the hospital are ill-equipped, medical personnels always on strike after months of warning strikes, and over-expensive drug. In all health issues in Nigeria, it is a place where even the Minister of Health, President name them, gets their common medical check-up abroad. Today, health problems have escalated with the problems of brain drain thus leading to increased mortality rate and reduction in life expectancy caused by lack of motivation for doctors and ill-equipped hospitals and facilities.

EDUCATION, the jewel of generation is dwindling. Nigerian education was once among the best in the world and a Nigerian pride, a place of total liberation, leveraging edge, scholars resort, and fulfilment of parents. While the universities, then, was a home for leaders, impact village, intellectual pursuit and final point of ‘‘think tanks’’ in Nigeria. Today, we live on lost glories as a result of been led by illiterates, visionless leaders: who went to schools with free books, free food, all levels of scholarships, no strikes and numerous jobs waiting for them after school. Students then that distinguished themselves in their academic prowess were also given all manners of scholarships to study at ‘‘any’’ place of their choice thus given a pride of place for hard work.  Yet, these people who enjoyed all these educational policies and facilities have now narrowed their vision with individualistic thinking and ‘‘pocket all for their next four generation’’ yet unborn. These decline are caused as a result of our so-called leaders by under-funding and over politicizing the educational sector: causing loss of interest, lack of research, cram based students, certificate based illiterates and poor education performances at all levels of educational ‘‘la cram la pure’’ with the aim of sending all their children and their dogs to foreign schools at alarming expenses.

The ECONOMY of Nigeria was once a pull factor for other economies. (Multi, 1804; Regional, 1946; Mono-economy, 1970). These dates might sound so funny, but let’s read on to see how true I have come about it. First, the reason behind the Jihad or the Holy War in 1804 was also because of the enormous wealth in the North. The Aba Women Riot in 1929 was also about wealth in the East and in the West most of the fights among the Yorubas were aimed at conquering more wealth and lands for farming and increasing homage paying from those conquered. It thus shows that Nigeria was so rich and could afford to pay anything for mirror, salt, and other things brought by the Portuguese, British and other foreigners even as early as in the 15th Century till the middle of the 20th Century. The coming in of the exploitative British economic policies was economically developmental even though it was aimed at cash crops driven policies for foreign exchange earning but it helped in putting in place infrastructures that aided regional economic development. The discovery of oil in Olobiri in 1946, ushered in the defined propensity for marked equality in regional wealth. With the help of Richards Constitution enshrining regional hopes, regionalism then becomes an economic tool in ensuring that each region increases her income through massive production for massive export for more foreign exchange thereby developing true fiscal federalism in practise. This continue until the issue of sharing policies began to set in which made some regions more lazy and hoping to always get something from the East (now some part called South-South) thus stagnating the already over exploited economy by the British. After the end of Nigeria civil war and the increase in oil price in the 1970’s, it looked as if our leaders have lost focus.

SOCIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURAL FACILITIES caused by corruption, improper award of contracts, inability of our leaders to finish a particular project before leaving offices thus using it as political campaign, policies inconsistency and lack of technical know-how.

POWER AND ENERGY caused by corruption and greed in this sector has placed the country on a ‘’no go investment area’’ causing massive unemployment, retrenchment, and low Foreign Direct Investment (FDI).

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES have left over 60% of Nigerian youths especially her teeming graduates unemployed thus rendering this energetic large group of working population in a growing economy useless.

The issue of PREBENDAL POLITICS which is also known as godfatherism at all facet of political representation is poised with questions. One begins to wonder its original and how it has became, if not the only means, of getting the seat of power and other positions, thus, throwing merit into the thrash can of the idiots.

UNITY – Nepotism and ethnicity caused by the nature of our federal structures.
DEVELOPMENT – Caused by lack of initiative for selfish gains.
CORRUPTION – Legalization of kickback, in cash and in services which has and will continue to make the country stagnant, if no conscious serious efforts with serious policies and institutions are put place to eradicate it.

I want to say to you, GEJ, that you didn’t just emerge as the President of Nigeria but rather won the hearts of millions on Nigerian who left their home or travelled to places where they have registered to make sure that they cast their votes for you in order for you to see and solve these problems by taking a quantum leap in your 4-years or so leadership tenure.

The problems of leadership in Nigeria are enormous but finding the willing, spirit minded leaders - who would not only pay lip services but rather take the giant stride in making a difference is the solution.

That leadership is what Nigerians need from you, not because your name is Goodluck; from a majority or minority group; formally in government or not; in a popular party or not; rich or poor; small or big and whatever it is, that could limit you is what Nigerian do not want to hear. What Nigerians are interested in is: YOU MUST DELIVER AND MAKE NIGERIANS PROUD.

CHIJIOKE, holds a professional certification in Management and a first degree in Political Science and one of the best graduating student in the said discipline from Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria. He is passionate about providing the leading platform for bearing the burden for his clients’ zenith successes which is hinged at providing exceptional Consulting Services in the areas of paper writing, biographies, training, political advisory, public speaking, business development, product marketing and advert production all in a practical solution driven and goal oriented perspectives. As the Principal/Head Consultant, HeroesPlus Consultant based in Lagos, his interest in research and development made him a social blogger and a prolific biographer. Among his works includes: Celebrating Our Country In Doubt: A Question Begging Patriotic Answer; Challenging Your Dreams; Nigeria Sixth Republic: 50 Years Of Unfinished Leadership; 2011, April Ballot: Winners, Losers And The Nigerians Lesson, among others. He is a member of Civil Liberty Organization, Rotaract Club to mention a few.

Send your questions and comments to heroesplusconsultant@gmail.com
To read more...Click on my Facebook page then ‘‘My Notes’’ to see some of my articles.
Thank you for reading.

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

SOCRATES ARGUES THAT WE SHOULD NEVER DISOBEY THE LAW BECAUSE DOING SO WILL HARM THE SOCIETY: HOW RIGHT IS IT TO SOMETIMES DISOBEY UNJUST LAWS USING THE JUST DECEASED ZONING SYSTEM OF THE PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY (PDP) AS A PARADIGM SHIFT FROM SOCRATES ARGUMENT?


SOCRATES ARGUES THAT WE SHOULD NEVER DISOBEY THE LAW BECAUSE DOING SO WILL HARM THE SOCIETY: HOW RIGHT IS IT TO SOMETIMES DISOBEY UNJUST LAWS USING THE JUST DECEASED ZONING SYSTEM OF THE PEOPLES DEMOCRATIC PARTY (PDP) AS A PARADIGM SHIFT FROM SOCRATES ARGUMENT?
Chijioke Akusoronwa

Socrates argues that we should never disobey the law because doing so will harm the society. Arising from Socrates argument, it becomes imperative to ask some questions and define some concepts in the questions. How come that law became a part of human life? What is law? Why do we need to obey law? How is it true that the law we obey is just or unjust? Man originally lived in a state of nature which was characterised by absolute anarchy. But, as time went by, people became fed up with the state of nature and surrendered their right to a state which guides every individual citizen by its laws. Thus, why must man be guided by law, but before further steps the meaning of law must be known.

Law can be defined as a body of rules and regulation that guides human conduct and accepted as binding by the society, enforced by the state and breach of which will result in punishment or sanction. This also implies that although laws are made to guide human conduct, it could be just and sometimes unjust. A just law is exactly a law for the fair treatment of people. This is based on the principle of equal right and justice. For instance, Sola’s phone was stolen in his room and while looking for it, he discovered it was stolen by Segun. Sola went and reported to the porter. The porter came and saw the exact phone with Sola’s name written at the phone back case. In the end, Segun was punished for it while Sola was given back his phone. This is a typical example of a just law i.e. fair justice on the part of the owner and doer of the evil act. An unjust law is a law which is exactly not deserved or fair. A typical example is the act of punishing Sola and allowing Segun to go free.

Socrates argues further that we should never disobey the law because doing so will harm the society. My questions are as follow:

What is obedient to the law?
Why must we be obedient to the law?
Why is it just that we should never disobey the law?

An act of complying with the law is obedient to the law. Disobedient, means that we are going against the law. Disobeying the law teaches the coming generation a culture which can also lead to decadence in that generation and affect the future generation. It also limits the constitution that guides the society and thereby harming the society.

I argued that laws must never be disobeyed because we ought to fulfill our agreement or promises. This agreement must be adhered to ensuring peace and stability in the society. Even if you argue that, why must we fulfil our agreement to obey the law? I will simply answer by saying that if we don’t fulfil our agreement, it means that we are unjust and breaking an agreement wrongs the law and will harm the society. I will also posit that by disobeying the law, we are unlawful but by obeying it shows that we are keeping to our promises which will not harm the society.

The other argument is that, it is sometimes right to disobey laws especially unjust laws because doing so will better the society. In the early paragraph of this work, unjust laws were explained to its criticism to be unjust laws. Then,
What is disobedience to the law?
Why must we sometimes disobey some laws?

Disobedient to the law means an act of a group, individual refusal to obey the law. It is sometimes seen that some laws are unpleasant. These laws are made to favour some particular class of people in the society. These kinds of laws are called obnoxious laws. An obnoxious law is a law extremely unpleasant and offend mostly those unprivileged groups or individuals in the society, thereby subjecting those laws to be disobeyed. So, such kind of obnoxious laws must be disobeyed, if not, it can affect and harm the society by destroying the existing norms, beliefs and values of the society.

How is it sometimes right to disobey laws?

It is because, it opens the room for proper consideration of societal values, ideologies and customs before further laws are enacted. It allows future laws to be made by critical thinkers, professionals after considering many factors to ensuring that the laws made by them are not easily prone to disobedient by the society.

Why is it sometimes right to disobey just law?

Remember that a law is not just even if it is just, it will never be just for all members of the society. So, this brings us to agree that not all laws are right to be obeyed. You may want to argue against it, that, it is just a few people that beliefs a just law is unjust? I would also refute the argument by lucidly showing that a law is just only when all members of the society agree that that law is absolutely right or just, not a few learned but learned and unlearned. So, I will argue further that all laws are unjust because it will never be absolutely just or unjust i.e exactly fair or exactly obnoxious by all members of the society in every condition.

How is it right to disobey unjust laws?

This brings us to the ideal question which you may wish to ask me. According to Kelvin Chappel he said, ‘Negativity attracts negativity, positivity attracts positivity’. This is to say that a law is unjust because it had been subject to a lot of disobedience by the society and that makes the law negative.

But you will also want to say that some still obey unjust laws?

My position is that those who obey unjust laws are just a few and larger in society where the few makes laws and dictate for the larger number who are poor thus at the mercy of the rich who rule them. In some situation, i.e like on gun point, some individual obey unjust laws but we must at this point understand that obeying laws for individual benefit is unjust. This means that the individual is unjust or unfair to the society and this simply shows that it is right to disobey unjust laws

I want to support my précis and the opinion that we should never disobey the law because doing so will harm the society. I want to argue this be saying that a citizen is free and equal, capable of entering into an agreement or contract with the intention he/she has with the state. If the state likes the intention he could stay but if the state doesn’t like it, he has the liberty to leave the city but if he stays, the city is expected to believe that the citizen has chosen freely to remain in the state and abide by its norm regardless of what he/she thinks of the form. It would be unjust for the citizen not to uphold the agreement with the society.

Also, I believe that the citizen has the right to persuade the city to his opinion, if the state does not hold that doing evil is unjust and that it is unjust to do evil with evil, I will agree but most society has already laid down principles and punishment for anyone who does it, in order to avoid the society from been in total anarchy.

Furthermore, I believe that justice in most case is not equal; what the parent or master may do is not something the child or slave is equally entitled to do. Even, if the society is wrong, it is wrong to avenge yourself that wrong by inflating wrong doing on the wrong deed.

Finally, I judge that it is never good to disobey the law because if the individuals or groups make decisions on whether to obey the laws of the society based solely on their private or individual circumstances, there can be no law or society at all. There can’t be law or society unless their rulings are authoritatively obeyed thus excluding other competing considerations.
Therefore, all laws must be obeyed when good while bad laws should be obeyed in a way that seeking redress and change does not cause harm to the society unless if such laws causes harm to the largest number of citizens.

CHIJIOKE, holds a professional certification in Management and a first degree in Political Science and one of the best graduating student in the said discipline from Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria. He is passionate about providing the leading platform for bearing the burden for his clients’ zenith successes which is hinged at providing exceptional Consulting Services in the areas of paper writing, biographies, training, political advisory, public speaking, business development, product marketing and advert production all in a practical solution driven and goal oriented perspectives. As the Principal/Head Consultant, HeroesPlus Consultant based in Lagos, his interest in research and development made him a social blogger and a prolific biographer. Among his works includes: Nigeria Sixth Republic: 50 Years Of Unfinished Leadership; Challenging Your Dreams; A Conscious Africa People Of Change Long Desired: Critical Look At African Today’s Politics In The Year 2011; Our Security And Our Nigeria: The Problems And The Solutions among others. He is a member of Civil Liberty Organization, Rotaract Club to mention a few.

Send your questions and comments to heroesplusconsultant@gmail.com
To read more...Click on my Facebook page then ‘‘My Notes’’ to see some of my articles.

Thank you for reading.